Number 10 Downing St Is Not Capable of the Task
Sir Keir Starmer visited north Wales on Thursday to declare the construction of a fresh nuclear energy facility. This is a major policy announcement with implications at local and countrywide levels. Yet, the PM did not dedicate much time in Wales to advocating answers for the UK's power requirements. Rather, he spent it trying to put an end to the Labour leadership briefing row, informing reporters that No 10 had not undermined the health secretary’s ambitions in recent days.
Therefore, Sir Keir’s day served as a microcosm of what his premiership has now become overall. On the one hand, he wants his government to be doing, and to be seen to be doing, important things. Conversely, he is incapable to achieve this due to the way he – and, to an extent, the country more generally – now practices politics and government.
The Prime Minister cannot transform the political culture single-handedly, but he can take action about his personal involvement in it. The simple truth is that he could run the centre of government much more effectively than he does. Should he achieve this, he might find that the nation was in less despair about his government than it currently is, and that he was communicating his points more successfully.
Personnel Problems in No 10
Some of the issues in Number 10 relate to individuals. The personal dynamics of every Downing Street operation are hard to know accurately from the exterior. But it seems obvious that Sir Keir does not make good personnel choices, or maintain them. Perhaps he is too busy. Perhaps he is not really interested. But he needs to up his game, not do things slowly or by halves.
- He dithered about giving the key job of cabinet secretary to Chris Wormald.
- He appointed a former official his top aide, then replaced her with Morgan McSweeney.
- He brought a Treasury figure in from the Treasury as his chief secretary.
- His media advisors have been frequently replaced.
- Advisors on politics and policy have entered and exited.
- It is a mess.
Structural Challenges at the Heart of Government
All premiers devote excessive time overseas and on foreign affairs, areas where Sir Keir ought to assign more tasks, and insufficient time talking to MPs and hearing the citizens. Prime ministers also allocate too much time doing media, which Sir Keir compounds by performing inadequately. But premiers cannot claim to be surprised when their politically appointed staff, who tend to be party loyalists or politically ambitious, cross lines or become the focus, as the chief of staff now has.
The most significant problems, though, are systemic. It would be beneficial to think that Sir Keir reviewed the a think tank's spring 2024 report on reforming the government's central operations. His inability to address these matters last July or since implies he did not. The often abject experience of Labour’s time in office suggests recommendations like reorganizing the functions of the central government office and No 10, and dividing the positions of top official and head of the civil service, are now urgent.
The dominant political role of PMs far outdistances the support available to them. Consequently, all aspects suffer, and many tasks are poorly executed or ignored.
This isn't Sir Keir’s fault alone. He stands as the casualty of previous shortcomings as well as the author of current mistakes. Yet individuals who expected Sir Keir might get a grip on the centre and prioritize governmental structures have been let down. Unfortunately, the primary casualty from this shortcoming is Sir Keir himself.