🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved positions for Māori representatives on NZ local authorities is set to be slashed by over 50%, after a divisive legislative amendment that required municipal councils to put the fate of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have multiple councillors depending on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to provide Māori electors the option to elect a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Initially, councils were only able to establish a Indigenous seat by initially putting it to a public vote in their area. Communities frequently devoted considerable time building local support and pushing their local governments to create Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the former administration allowed municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, stating communities should decide whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The new legislation required local authorities that had established a ward under the previous policy to conduct decisive public votes concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on October 11. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the referendum, 17 decided to keep their wards, and 25 to abolish theirs – showing numerous areas opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes provided “a crucial move in restoring local democratic control.”

Opposition parties however have condemned the new policy as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has implemented sweeping rollbacks to measures intended to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has said it aims to end “ethnic-specific” approaches, and says it is committed to enhancing results for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the public votes were split down city-country divisions – most cities mandated to hold referendums backed Māori wards, while rural regions skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

This year’s local government elections recorded the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with under one-third of eligible voters participating, prompting calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Councils are permitted to create other types of wards – including rural wards – without initially mandating a community ballot. The disparate requirements placed on Māori wards suggested the administration was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement referred to the 17 areas that voted to retain their wards.